Corporate conflict and analyze the legal case Research Paper

Corporate conflict and analyze the legal case - query Paper ExampleThe key factor that denies the organization an bring up is its own punishable plea regarding the environmental crimes it had been charged with. Secondly, the organization opted for an administrative Consent Agreement and Final Order (CAFO) as a government agency of getting a resolution to the violations.Among the limited conditions under which the courts can accept the withdrawal of a guilty plea is if it is presented before the judges have true the plea, and that is usually in the pre-sentence scenario (Weaver, 2001). It could also be accepted before defendants have been sentenced. Further, Walmart cannot show that they were served with obvious injustice because of conditions that existed during the time they were charged with the environmental crimes. The organization was aware of federal laws that required them to determine hazardous waste, prepare its manifest, and handle and dispose it as stipulated but fai led to control those requirements. At the same time, Walmart contracted Greenleaf to recycle its pesticide products, yet Greenleaf lacked the capacity for handling such products, which lead to the unwrap of hazardous substances. Although it is not clear whether or not Walmart of aware of this lack of capacity, it was their legal responsibility to prepare whether Greenleaf met all the requirements stipulated by law. This means that Walmart becomes legally responsible for contractors conducting business on its behalf. It can, therefore, be shown that the judgment served was competent to hold the organization accountable for its own as well as its contractors unratified and irresponsible business conduct that was a threat to the environment and life.Walmart may also not appeal against the ruling because there are no sufficient indications that they are not guilty because of lack of appreciation the charges or consequences of pleading guilty. That can be demonstrated by United Sta tes v. Spencer, 836 F.2d 236, 239 (6th Cir. 1987). If the lawyers entered the guilty plea