Is There a Purpose of Life? Essay

IntroductionBetween ages, humans have metamorphosed to a different aim with plethora of inventions and individual identifications, yet a univers aloney acceptable answer to a prime question like whether there is a dissolve of invigoration still remains as elusive as it had always been. Even the scientists too evade this question by saying science can only(prenominal) answer how rather than wherefore (Meaning, 2008). This state of affairs has divided three schools of position one, who says there is no purpose of tone, two, who refutes the claims of the former and the third, who stays away from this debate. consequently this act explores the views of the first and second schools of thought before coming to its own conclusion.There is No purpose of invigoration. People who believe there is no purpose of life stress on objective evidence to build their premise.Since there is no concrete evidence of why life manifests in so many forms or procreates, it usually generates the in ference that there is no purpose of life. There is no point in underestimating the collective intellect of the majority who find themselves clueless roughly what it could be the meaning and purpose of life mostly because they dont find any. Even the in-depth analysis of life could only determine the processes, but non a valid reason behind it. After an exhaustive analysis of the question, NASA came to the conclusion that life, all life, is the attribute of any system that is a) capable of replication, b) capable of every(prenominal) conversion in order to offset entropy and c) subject to the process of evolution(Requadt, 2006)The prey-predator cycle ultimately turns to a level playing field where severally living component shows its purpose as if either to utilize other(a)s or to be utilized by others. This cannot serve any clue as to why this game is going on, as the entire game is based on molecular activity at various levels, involving uncountable elements and processes unde r various time frames. Thus this enormity of the process itself defies any set principle to hint about any purpose behind all these.There is no tangible or universally acceptable proof that life stems from a single condensed form of power (as God or any superpower) that exists on and on even later the death of a living being. Thus the concepts like God creates living beings with a specific purpose or purposes are mere hypotheses backed by belief. Belief cannot be cited as evidence and therefore theories involving God as the creator of life in any case gets eliminated.The arguments placed by this school of thought understandably show that it does not allow any room to the individual human strongizations regarding the purpose of life, as all humans do not certify such realization as commonplace experience substantiating the purpose of life on earth. This brings up one point to the fore that the difference among humans in cognitive plane prevents them to achieve or align same ki nd of realization or understanding about life or its purpose and gum olibanum this school of thought indemnifies only the findings on the objective level. However, this seems too one-sided, because the significance of subjectivity in this issue is extremely important.There is Purpose of LifeThe other school of thought that admits about life having some purpose chooses to furbish up it as something beyond ordinary comprehension and is far greater than personal fulfilment (Warren, 2004). This school relies on the model of superpower having its own purpose running behind creation and maintenance of the flow of life on earth. This school of thought recognizes individual experiences on cognitive plane and uses that to substantiate their claim while arguing about the limitation of humans or other living beings to engender the big picture from objective angle.It is true that there is no dearth of instances that defies earthly logic, as for example, some accurate predictions done by indi viduals or soul claiming to receive some idea in dream or experiencing strange feelings that indicates the existence of a superpower.DiscussionSince it is admitted that there are evidences regarding human in index to condone all the happenings on earth, it would be fair to say that if an issue (purpose of life) remains unresolved for so long, then it definitely hints at the inadequacy of knowledge that tries to define it.There is a distinct difference in analyzing a subject with limited range of knowledge (which is usually considered as rationality) and discovering or realizing something on cognitive plane. As for example, the purpose of life from the biological perspective is explicit that it wants to maintain the identity of the form it takes (Luisi, 2008), though gradually metamorphosing to the tune of evolution. While this trait also takes place on the temporal plane of humans it cannot be explicit like its counterpart, as this development is intangible, where an individual re aches a impertinent plane of realization on his/her own.While it is true that the individual account of any realization cannot be taken as a proof of the idea it presents, it cannot be ignored either. Then that would defy the process of development, which is evidenced by numerous human inventions that were initially considered as wild imagination of the individuals. However, individual account of any new experience on the cognitive plane is hard to inject into another individual to get the same result, mostly because of the difference in cognitive ability and consequently the great divide among individual knowledge on anything persists all along.Therefore, sporadic individual accounts of certain realization about the possible purpose of life, such as the accounts of some acknowledged great human beings who repeatedly told about a unique of discovery of our lifes connection with one unequivocal power, cannot settle the issue for once and all. As for example if someone says the pur pose of life is to recreate yourself anew in the highest version of the grandest vision you ever had about yourself (Walsch, 1996), some will believe it, some will refute it and some will refrain from commenting on it. However, not believing that there is a purpose of life will not prevent one from discovering it (How to, 2008).ConclusionPrimarily the question of whether there is any purpose of life commands the answer from the depth of perception about life. The above discussion clearly shows that the difference in cognitive abilities prevents humans to align their ideas about the purpose of life. While that seems disappointing, the increasing trend of overall temporal refinement among humans shows promise to settle this issue someday, as imagination and realization both command higher processing ability of all possible inputs including he ones that even defy the reference frame of the living beings of the earth that is, the reference frame of light. Over all it seems the discove ry of the purpose of life depends on further manifestation of consciousness among humans or among the major part of them to establish it as a proven conclusion.ReferencesIs there a real meaning and purpose to life? Web document. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//guide.gospelcom.net/resources/meaning.phpHow to discover your life purpose in about 20 minutes. Web document. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//www.stevepavlina.com/ web log/2005/01/how-to-discover-your-life-purpose-in-about-20-minutes/Luisi, L. P. (2008). Does Science See A Purpose In Life? Web article. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//www.cts.cuni.cz/conf98/luisi.htmRequadt, W.E. 2006. The Meaning of Life. Book excerpt. Retrieved 2 April, 2008, from http//www.rationality.net/meaning.htmWalsch, N. D. (1996). Conversations with God An Uncommon Dialogue. Putnam Adult, foremost edition.Warren, R. (2004). Purpose Driven Life. Zondervan Michigan, USA. Book excerpt. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//pddocs.purposedrive n.com8088/docs/pdl/samplechapters/woeaihf.pdf